← Global AI Laws & Governance Research Library
Operationalizing the Gen-AI Voluntary Code of Conduct for Canadian Critical Infrastructure Entities
Prepared by Shubhank Suman · Last reviewed
CURRENT / VOLUNTARY / NON-BINDING
- Legal character
- AI risk-management implementation guidance
- Region
- North America
- Published
- 25 September 2024
What it covers
This document operationalises Canada's voluntary approach to generative-AI governance for critical infrastructure. It recognises that AI may enter infrastructure intentionally or through existing IT and operational-technology products, where failure may affect public safety, essential services, communications, transportation, energy, financial systems, digital infrastructure and national resilience. It uses the NIST-style GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE and MANAGE structure and is broad and non-prescriptive rather than a mandatory checklist.
Why it matters
It connects AI governance with the heightened safety, security and resilience consequences of critical-infrastructure environments.
Refer to it when
Use it for critical-infrastructure AI governance, organisational accountability, use-case and dependency mapping, risk measurement, continuous mitigation, incident response, operational technology, supply-chain controls and resilience.
AI, privacy and cybersecurity relevance
- AI: Very High
- Privacy: High
- Cyber: Very High
AI
VERY HIGH RELEVANCE
The document expressly operationalises AI governance through GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE and MANAGE for critical-infrastructure organisations.
Privacy
MODERATE / HIGH INDIRECT RELEVANCE
The document is not a privacy statute. Applicable Canadian federal and provincial privacy laws still govern. Its data-governance analysis is relevant to employee, customer, operational, communications, security, location, access-control and sensitive infrastructure information.
Cybersecurity
VERY HIGH RELEVANCE
It covers IT, operational technology, cloud services, AI supply chains, third-party vendors, availability, integrity, monitoring and resilience, bridging the NIST AI RMF with critical-infrastructure AI safety.
Applicability
Canadian critical-infrastructure owners, operators and related stakeholders, including suppliers of AI-enabled products or services into critical-infrastructure environments.
Current validity
CURRENT VOLUNTARY GUIDANCE.
Read first
Introduction & Purpose → AI Risk Governance Framework → GOVERN → MAP → MEASURE → MANAGE → AI Incident/Risk Controls → Critical-Infrastructure Application.
Provisions / sections covered
GOVERN
Establish policies, procedures, roles, responsibilities, risk ownership, organisational values and culture, aligned with law and sector-specific regulation.
MAP
Understand the use case, stakeholders, legal and sector obligations, operational dependencies, potential harms, data flows and third-party dependencies.
MEASURE
Use quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods to analyse risks, benchmark performance, monitor impacts and evaluate effects on operations and organisational data.
MANAGE
Continuously monitor change, mitigate risk, respond to incidents, review controls, escalate material issues and modify or suspend unsafe uses.
Subject-matter tags
- Employment data
- Surveillance
- AI governance
- AI safety
- Generative AI
- Transparency
- Risk management
- AI cybersecurity
- Accountability
Subject-matter tags describe what the indexed text discusses. They are not legal conclusions.
Related instruments in this library
- Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA), CanadaBill · HistoricalSame jurisdiction; assess applicability separately.
- Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022: Bill C-27: CanadaBill · HistoricalSame jurisdiction; assess applicability separately.
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act: PIPEDA: CanadaLaw · CurrentSame jurisdiction; assess applicability separately.
- Voluntary Code of Conduct on the Responsible Development and Management of Advanced Generative AI Systems, CanadaCode of Conduct · Voluntary / non-bindingSame jurisdiction; assess applicability separately.
- Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL), S.C. 2010, c. 23Law · Current (phased commencement)Same jurisdiction; assess applicability separately.
Document page in the Knowledge Base - full text or PDF where it is available for this record.
This library locates primary and official sources. It does not interpret the law and it is not legal advice.